Why research? How three new papers will advance the cause of peace in Canada

Quakers have always understood that bearing witness is not passive. It requires us to show up—in meeting houses, in communities, and increasingly, in the spaces where policy is shaped and decisions are made. This year, CFSC is taking on three new peace-related research projects, and we want to share with Friends why we believe this work is a faithful and strategic use of our resources.

Research as a form of witness

Peace advocacy is most effective when it’s grounded in evidence. When we bring carefully researched and academically sound analyses to conversations about peace policy, international multilateralism, and what defence really means, we’re not just adding our voice to the chorus—we’re contributing something the field genuinely needs. Our goal is to produce work that holds up to scrutiny in non-Quaker spaces: in policy journals, academic publications, and government consultations. That kind of credibility takes time to build, and it starts with doing the research well.

We also recognize that CFSC’s relationship with the Canadian government—and our ability to be heard in public consultations—grows stronger when we come to the table with substantive contributions. Research gives us that standing. It signals that we are not simply advocating from values alone, but offering analysis that decision-makers can engage with and cite.

The three papers underway this year reflect areas where we believe Quakers have something meaningful to say. The first examines the history of peacebuilding in Canadian government policy—tracing the commitments Canada has made, and asking what it would mean to take them seriously again. The second challenges prevailing assumptions about defence and security, offering a reframing that centres climate defence, human security, and conflict prevention rather than militarization. The third engages with the United Nations’ Transitional Justice framework, exploring Quaker implications for peace and accountability in today’s most urgent conflicts.

“We are not simply advocating from values alone, but offering analysis that decision-makers can engage with and cite.”

 

Each paper is distinct, but together they point in a common direction: toward a Canada that leads with peace. We hope this work will also provide our Network partners—the many organizations across Canada working toward similar ends—with shared language and calls to action they can carry into their own advocacy. A more unified voice among Canadian peace organizations is something worth working toward deliberately, and research is one way to build that common ground.

We’re grateful for the support of Friends that makes this work possible. We welcome your questions, your reflections, and your engagement. Peace is built together.

Mel Burns is CFSC’s Peace Program Coordinator.